6.27.2002

This is our opinion...maybe



Judge Stays Own 'Pledge' Ruling

A day after he shocked the nation by declaring the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional, a federal appeals court judge in San Francisco put his ruling on hold Thursday.
What, he's surprised by the typhoon he and the others created? I can see him now, mumbling to himself, "I'm not gonna take the heat alone. Let's get all 11 of us to vote! Why in God's (unconstitutional) name did I have to write that god(oops)damn opinion?!?"

I'm telling ya, this is one of the funnier political and judicial moments in US history.

Ron Barrier of American Atheists Incorporated in New York endorsed Wednesday's court ruling and said atheists are standing firm in the midst of the decision's criticism.

Barrier said the government needs to recognize that there are millions of Americans with no religious beliefs who still are patriots and citizens and taxpayers.
And many millions more who hold strong religious beliefs. Amazingly, all those in the Senate and in the House who in the past have cried "foul" whenever the notion of school prayer is brought up, are screaming against this decision. Hypocrits all.

Equally amusing is the reaction of Michael Newdow, the man who filed the original suit. His honest observation is that Congress is up in arms in order to garner votes, but then he makes himself look silly when he speaks about how listening to the Pledge "injured" his daughter. His second grade age daughter.

And it turns out he originally filed this suit in Florida four years ago.

Why can't he just admit he's using his daughter as leverage to get this thing into court? This crap about protecting his daughter from the ravages of religion is just nauseating.

He would be on firmer, better ground just quoting Eisenhower when he signed the bill that inserted "under God" into the Pledge, in 1954.

In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future.


The question is whether "under God" imposes a specific faith. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof[.]" What faith is invoked by the use of the word "god"? I can think of several right off the top of my head.

It's all so amusing, really. I think many are genuinely surprised by the uproar. They literally hadn't a clue.

No comments: